An extended debate on another issue, forced Sen. Will Kraus, R-Jackson County, to move his bill to the informal calendar.
Traffic fines currently go to the city and Gatso, the traffic light installation company. One third of the money goes to Gatso, while the other two thirds is given to the city where the violation happened. Missouri charges $120 for traffic camera violations.
In 2011, Gatso received $54,076 from Columbia. After police personnel, court and prosecution costs, the City of Columbia received $18,047 in 2011.
Opponents of the bill argued the automatic enforcement helps safety by encouraging people to obey red lights.
Kraus, however, said safety is not the issue to the opposition, but losing revenue for the opposition's district. The bill's sponsor continued saying all of the senators in oppositon are from regions where red light cameras bring in a large sum of money to their area, and this bill would take it away.
"Don't put in speed cameras or red light cameras to raise revenue. It's a hidden form of revenue that I think is unconstitutional and unfair," said Kraus.
CORRECTION: The original version of this story incorrectly quoted that Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal had questioned the safety of red-light cameras. The attribution of the statement to her was incorrect. Just the opposite of the quote, Chappelle-Nadal led the fight in the Senate to preserve the red-light camera enforcement system.