The governor's $100 million job-creation incentive program would have provided 'forgivable loans' to businesses that pledged to create 100 new jobs in Missouri within the next five years. Nixon had estimated the program would create up to 4,000 jobs. The money was expected to come from budget stabilization funds provided by the federal government.
It had faced criticism from lawmakers in both parties who said the plan didn't provide enough details about how the program would be administered.
The House Budget Committee on Monday removed all of the money during a daylong hearing and reallocated most of it to one-time projects. The budget bill, along with the three others approved by the committee, have already been considered by the Senate and now moves to the House floor. Once the bills are approved by the House, they must be reconciled in a joint House and Senate committee before being sent to the governor.
The Legislature must send the budget to the governor's office by May 8. If the chambers cannot come to an agreement, lawmakers will likely face a special session after the regular session ends May 15.
At this stage of the budget process, a majority of the money cannot be removed unless it is replaced elsewhere in the budget. During the hearing, members of both parties submitted amendments to distribute the $100 million across the state, including:
The maintenance and repair money would more closely align the UM System with a 45 percent funding increase given to other state schools earlier in the session, said Rep. Chris Kelly, D-Columbia, who sponsored the amendment.
"All boats ought to rise on the same tide," Kelly said. "Now everybody's up a little bit."
The money would give the UM System a 10 percent increase in repair and maintenance funding instead of the expected 30 percent decrease.
The governor's office argued that the budget stabilization money used by the committee for one-time projects was intended for job creation, not legislators' "pet projects."
"In a time when we have a 25-year high in unemployment, the governor believes investing in job creation should take precedent over pet projects," Nixon spokesman Scott Holste said.
House Budget Committee Chairman Allen Icet, R-Wildwood, said Nixon's job creation program could also be considered a pet project. He said the committee dedicated the funds to good projects and simply had different priorities than the governor.